Julieanne had a great idea and she was volunteered to be the first entry...or as she calls it, victim.
Author:
|
Julieanne Reeves
|
Genre:
|
Romantic Suspense
|
Book:
|
Nick of Time, book 2 in the Walking a Thin Blue Line Series
Unpublished |
Julieanne's
Email:
|
Okay,
so it's a few more than 500 (about 700), but I wanted to get you to a good
point. Use which ever you want. :)
|
Kristin:
|
Thank you! While I may read the entire 723 words, your readers
may not wait that long to be drawn in. The first 500 words are important. If
you think the “good point” doesn’t happen before then, consider moving it up.
|
Julieanne:
|
I think the first 500
words give a pretty good idea where the book is headed, especially on the
heels of the prologue. I included the few extra words so that there was
more of a finish to the “scene”.
|
Chapter One
Payson
Arizona, Three Days Later...
Kristin:
|
I assume your
chapter one starts three days after your Prologue. That’s good. Your reader
most likely won’t feel they’ve invested their time for something irrelevant.
(They can feel that way when a Prologue occurs in the far, distant past, even
if the Prologue is VERY relevant.)
|
Officer Nick Astenbeck sat at the nurses’ station inside
the Emergency Department of Payson Regional Medical Center typing up his
incident report. He'd been here for hours, tying up what now amounted to a
homicide. Nick glanced into the dark triage room across the hall where he
could see the outline of two children sleptsleeping, wrapped
tightly around each other. Dispatch had received a frantic 911 call from the
six-year-old girl. She'd taken the phone and her little brother, and hidden them in the a closet when her
mother's boyfriend started beating their mom.
With
a hammer.
Kristin:
|
Great hook. Anyone who read your first novel will be
looking for this.
This hasn’t been edited yet,
but watch for recurring words. “…typing up
his incident report” and “…tying up
what now amounted to a homicide” can get distracting so close together. My
suggestion is to cut the first “up.” I believe your sentence is more powerful
without it.
|
Julieanne:
|
You’re right, this is
an initial/rough draft. But I agree with your changes. :)
|
Kristin:
|
Can Nick see the children from the
nurses’ station? If not, he might glance across the hall where he left two children sleeping, wrapped
tightly around each other.
|
Julieanne:
|
Yes, he can see into
the trauma bay from where he’s sitting at the nurse’s station. Payson is a
real life town and, while I use it fictitiously, the Emergency Department of
the regional hospital is laid out with a horse shoe of trauma bays
surrounding it. Each visible from a central nurses' station.
|
Kristin:
|
(Ohh. Check out the new redlines
then.)
Nick is a police officer. Would his
internal dialogue refer to the six-year-old girl’s brother as “little” or
“younger?” He’s also writing his incident report—would his words would be
more procedural since he’s in cop mode?
“The” closet or “a” closet? “The”
implies there was only one closet in their home—and there may have been.
|
Julieanne:
|
I’d go with “a” in this
case.
|
Nick and backup officers had
arrived to find a badly beaten woman lying in a pool of her own blood on the
living room floor. She'd been alive. Barely. The suspect, however, had
been was crashing through the house, bloody
hammer still in hand, screaming for the children to come out of hiding. The
suspect’s intent had been clear about what he'd intended to do to the children
once he'd found them. There was no question about
what he intended to do. He'd been screaming it in sickening detail.
Kristin:
|
Gross! Exactly what you’re going for!
|
Julieanne:
|
Ha! Be glad you haven’t seen the crime scene
photos. Just sayin.
|
Kristin:
|
“Had beens” are good sometimes, but try to use sparingly. They remind
the reader they are in a flashback of sorts. Since your readers just came out
of a Prologue, try to remove “had beens” all together. Readers might be anxious to read what’s happening in the present day.
Sometimes less is more in a tense situation. Thus my removing of,
“…to come out of hiding.”
“The suspect’s intent had been clear about what he’d intended to do
to the children once he’d found them.” This is a little repetitive and
confusing. Also mucho “had beens!”
I’m just offering you the same information in a more direct sentence. You
don’t have to use this one. This is one of many.
|
Julieanne:
|
Good choice, and something I’m totally okay with. I may
be able to write the story, but I have to depend on an editor to help make it
look good.
|
Kristin:
|
(Good thing ‘cause we depend on you authors to write them. J)
|
Nick and fellow officers
Kristin:
|
“…that bloody” makes me think Nick is British. I know he
means a literal bloody hammer, but my first thought was—BBC?
|
Julieanne:
|
Ha! No, Nick is not British. He’s originally from Texas, so he
has a bit of an accent.
|
Kristin:
|
When using pronouns (he, she) be sure readers know who the he and she are. Here, Nick was referring to himself as “he,” then to the
suspect. It takes a second to understand the switch and that’s a second
readers are out of your story.
|
God,
his heart ached for them.
They had no idea the grim road that lay ahead in
store for them. When Child Protective Services arrived—and where the
hell were they anyway? He'd called them three hours ago.
—they'd The children would be
taken to an emergency placement until either a family member or an adoptive
family could be located. Either way, they'd have to go on without their mother.
Judging by the conditions of the house, and the drug paraphernalia that had
been scattered about, Nick wasn't sure it
wasn't for the best,. but But how did do
you tell that to a child who only knew that the mother they loved was gone.? Forever.
Kristin:
|
Does “…no idea the grim road that lay in store for them”
give an odd visual to you? Roads usually lay ahead of a person (for them to
travel). Bad tidings, results of actions, and consequences are in store for
people.
|
Julieanne:
|
Good point. Reads much better that way.
|
Kristin:
|
“and” is removed after your 2-em dash because Nick’s changing
thoughts. The em dash shows one thought is being interrupted by a new
thought—“and” makes it read like the thoughts are more related than they
actually are.
|
Julieanne:
|
That makes sense.
|
Kristin:
|
The yellow highlighted section—is Nick thinking it is for the best that the
children are going on without their mother? That’s how I read this and,
though it might be in the children’s best interest, this could make him very
unlikeable. Especially the way he delivers this thought.
Consider, “Judging by the conditions of the house and the drug
paraphernalia that had been scattered about, Nick wasn’t sure a new home was
a bad thing” or something similar.
(You also don’t want to put “wasn’t” twice in a sentence if you can
help it.)
|
Julieanne:
|
That’s the general thought I was going for, but I see
your point on rewording it.
|
By the time Nick had his report finished his report, and the booking paperwork ready,
CPS had arrived. The frazzled worker confirmed what Nick had feared. They'd
be headed The children were heading to the
crisis shelter, where they'd be separated until they could be placed in a home.
It left Nick seethed seething in
anger at the fuck-head that who had taken
the children's mother away from them, and at a system that would separate
siblings at a time when they needed each other the most.
Kristin:
|
Direct sentences are easier for the reader to digest.
You don’t always want them, but you sometimes do.
“It” is the news that the children were being separated. “It” should
be defined, but “The news left Nick seething…” is passive. Thus—Nick seethed.
|
Julieanne:
|
I have complete respect for editors. You can take a
story and with your magic-wand skills
make it shine.
|
Nick had just crawled into his patrol
car and advised dispatch that he was clear of the E.R. when his cell phone
rang. Dispatch.
Julieanne:
|
Kristin, thanks for
taking the time to do this. I love writing a story and then watching an
editor do their voodoo and make it shine.
Can’t wait to see who’s next.
|
Kristin:
|
Aha! But we’re not done yet!
|
“Whatever the question is,
the answer is no.” He'd already put in a sixteen-hour day. And after this last
case he was done.
“Now is that any way to greet the person who has an important message for you?” Hayden. She was one of his favorite dispatchers to work with.
Nick sighed. “Can you just throw them in my box and I'll get them tomorrow?”
“Nope, this one is personal. She sounded rather upset.”
Nick ran a weary hand down his face. “Who did?”
“Sarah.”
“Sarah? My Sarah?” No, not your Sarah, Seth's Sarah. But no matter how many times he told himself that his heart refused to listen.
“The one and only. She said it's important.”
Nick pulled into his driveway and killed the engine. “It must be if she's calling dispatch. I'm home, mark me 10-7”.
“Night.” She said and disconnected to answer another officer's radio call.
Nick pulled out his cell phone and dialed the number from memory. By the third ring Nick was ready to hang up afraid he'd wake Sarah and the kids.
“Hello?” Sarah said, breathlessly. Nick's gut clinched. Or worse interrupt something.
He had to clear his throat before he could speak. “Sarah, it's me. Nick.”
“Oh, thank God,” she whispered, her voice trembling.
Nick sat up straight, his senses on high alert. “What's wrong?”
“Now is that any way to greet the person who has an important message for you?” Hayden. She was one of his favorite dispatchers to work with.
Nick sighed. “Can you just throw them in my box and I'll get them tomorrow?”
“Nope, this one is personal. She sounded rather upset.”
Nick ran a weary hand down his face. “Who did?”
“Sarah.”
“Sarah? My Sarah?” No, not your Sarah, Seth's Sarah. But no matter how many times he told himself that his heart refused to listen.
“The one and only. She said it's important.”
Nick pulled into his driveway and killed the engine. “It must be if she's calling dispatch. I'm home, mark me 10-7”.
“Night.” She said and disconnected to answer another officer's radio call.
Nick pulled out his cell phone and dialed the number from memory. By the third ring Nick was ready to hang up afraid he'd wake Sarah and the kids.
“Hello?” Sarah said, breathlessly. Nick's gut clinched. Or worse interrupt something.
He had to clear his throat before he could speak. “Sarah, it's me. Nick.”
“Oh, thank God,” she whispered, her voice trembling.
Nick sat up straight, his senses on high alert. “What's wrong?”
“Seth.
He's...he's...dead.”
Kristin:
|
Jules! This is the most relevant part! This is the content your readers are
going to read about for the next 300-400 pages. Move this up.
Unless the children are
relevant to the rest of your story, you could reasonably cut about two
paragraphs of Nick’s what-happened-earlier pondering. If it’s something you’re willing to do I highlighted (in gray) the beginning
of the paragraphs I think could go.
The first highlighted
paragraph doesn’t have to be completely cut, but it could be combined with
the following paragraph. That way you get to keep the “eww! Gross!” factor,
but lose the things that don’t push the story or give any knowledge to the
reader.
|
Thank you for letting me use Nick of Time and for suggesting the idea, Julieanne!
It’s already a huge hit.
To learn about Julieanne Reeves and her upcoming titles please visit her website, Facebook page, and Goodreads.
Thank you both for sharing! I have new respect for editors, and authors willing to put their hard work in another person's hands!
ReplyDeleteKristin, your suggestions didn't change the story, just "sharpened" it in a few spots. Amazing.
I have wanted to read Nick of Time since the last few pages of Razing Kane. Hope it's soon!
Thanks Pat! It's great to see you here. When Nick of Time is released, I'm sure you'll be the first to read it! You're always our number one fan. Mwah!
DeleteWaves at Pat. Thanks for stopping by. I agree with you, it's awesome to watch an editor take a story and clean it up without changing the actual story. I love eidtors. :)
DeleteThanks, Kristin, for showing us your editing skills. I thought a lot of your points were spot on. I would, however, remove the filter word when you added the line: "...where he [could see] the outline of two children sleeping." Change "could see" to saw. It's more direct.
ReplyDeletePast perfect is a buggabear for me. I used to think as you do that too many "hads" is a bad thing, but my Harlequin copyeditor put back in all the ones I'd taken out. So it may depend on the publisher.
I absolutely agree the second half of this sample should move up to the front and the backstory would be better if used later. I like to get to know the characters right away when I start reading a book and this material, as it is now, struck me more like a report than a story. But the second part shows Nick's personality, what's important to him, how he deals with the people in his life. That's key to compelling fiction, IMO.
I think the second half of the material could be tightened up a bit and dialogue tags like this one need to be fixed: “Night.” She said and...' There should be a comma after night, and the word "she" should be lower case.
Thanks, Karen!
DeleteGreat point on changing "could see" to "saw." I was worried that if the sentence read "...where he saw" it would give the impression that he just now saw the children, as opposed to him having been with them the entire night.
The hope is that "could see" implies Nick has a sense of responsibility for the children. (Almost like you see the neighbor's kids run by. You can see your children playing in the yard.)
Thoughts? I'm really curious for you opinion on this.
Do you know why your copyeditor put the "hads" back? (Pacing or did they help the sentence make more sense?) I've added them on occasion--when helping differentiate between what HAS happened and what's happening now.
This is great feedback. Thank you!
Hmmm, let me try that "could see" explanation again. I was trying to imply responsibility--like you happen to see the neighbor's kids run by, but you stand where you can see your children playing in the yard.
DeleteHopefully leading the reader to think that Nick chose to finish his reports at that spot so he could watch over the children.
I still don't think you need the "could see" because it sounds tentative, at least it does to me. It might work if his ability to see was in question. For example, it was so dark he hardly saw anything but he "could see" the outline of the children. I think it depends on the situation for how a filter might be used. You just need to establish the necessity of it first. IMO. I don't know Nick yet, what he's feeling or thinking, so I have no clue as to his sense of responsibility. Which adds to the problem of starting the book here. Who is Nick and why should we care about him?
DeleteAs for the had-happy copyeditor, she was going strictly by the book, which as you know isn't always appropriate for fiction. But she was a stickler for the rules (Harlequin tends to be), and that's why they were put back in. HOWEVER, I argued the point on a few of them and won. Yay, me. LOL.
Karen, thank you so much for your input. :) I'm pretty sure I changed the starting point of my first book, RAZING KAYNE, half a dozen times.
DeleteExcellent points. Thank you.
DeleteStrictly by the book? You've given me things to research. :) You're right--sometimes it does and doesn't work for fiction. It's great to know the rules, though, as Harlequin does.