Showing posts with label The Romantic Editor Blog. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Romantic Editor Blog. Show all posts

Thursday, April 11, 2013

Romance Critique: Author Julieanne Reeves

About a month ago, author Julieanne Reeves approached me about offering critiques on The Romantic Editor. She and I are Internet buddies and she knew I was looking for content to post.

Julieanne had a great idea and she was volunteered to be the first entry...or as she calls it, victim.


Author:
Julieanne Reeves
Genre: 
Romantic Suspense
Book: 
Nick of Time, book 2 in the Walking a Thin Blue Line Series
Unpublished


Julieanne's Email: 
Okay, so it's a few more than 500 (about 700), but I wanted to get you to a good point. Use which ever you want. :)


Kristin:
Thank you! While I may read the entire 723 words, your readers may not wait that long to be drawn in. The first 500 words are important. If you think the “good point” doesn’t happen before then, consider moving it up.

Julieanne: 
I think the first 500 words give a pretty good idea where the book is headed, especially on the heels of the prologue. I included the few extra words so that there was more of a finish to the “scene”.


Chapter One
            Payson Arizona, Three Days Later...


Kristin:
I assume your chapter one starts three days after your Prologue. That’s good. Your reader most likely won’t feel they’ve invested their time for something irrelevant. (They can feel that way when a Prologue occurs in the far, distant past, even if the Prologue is VERY relevant.)

            Officer Nick Astenbeck sat at the nurses’ station inside the Emergency Department of Payson Regional Medical Center typing up his incident report. He'd been here for hours, tying up what now amounted to a homicide. Nick glanced into the dark triage room across the hall where he could see the outline of two children sleptsleeping, wrapped tightly around each other. Dispatch had received a frantic 911 call from the six-year-old girl. She'd taken the phone and her little brother, and hidden them in the closet when her mother's boyfriend started beating their mom.

            With a hammer.

Kristin:
Great hook. Anyone who read your first novel will be looking for this.

This hasn’t been edited yet, but watch for recurring words. “…typing up his incident report” and “…tying up what now amounted to a homicide” can get distracting so close together. My suggestion is to cut the first “up.” I believe your sentence is more powerful without it.

Julieanne: 
You’re right, this is an initial/rough draft. But I agree with your changes. :)

Kristin:
Can Nick see the children from the nurses’ station? If not, he might glance across the hall where he left two children sleeping, wrapped tightly around each other.

Julieanne:
Yes, he can see into the trauma bay from where he’s sitting at the nurse’s station. Payson is a real life town and, while I use it fictitiously, the Emergency Department of the regional hospital is laid out with a horse shoe of trauma bays surrounding it. Each visible from a central nurses' station.

Kristin:
(Ohh. Check out the new redlines then.)

Nick is a police officer. Would his internal dialogue refer to the six-year-old girl’s brother as “little” or “younger?” He’s also writing his incident report—would his words would be more procedural since he’s in cop mode?

“The” closet or “a” closet? “The” implies there was only one closet in their home—and there may have been.

Julieanne:
I’d go with “a” in this case.


            Nick and backup officers had arrived to find a badly beaten woman lying in a pool of her own blood on the living room floor. She'd been alive. Barely. The suspect, however, had been was crashing through the house, bloody hammer still in hand, screaming for the children to come out of hiding. The suspect’s intent had been clear about what he'd intended to do to the children once he'd found them. There was no question about what he intended to do. He'd been screaming it in sickening detail.

Kristin:
Gross! Exactly what you’re going for!

Julieanne:
Ha! Be glad you haven’t seen the crime scene photos. Just sayin.

Kristin:
“Had beens” are good sometimes, but try to use sparingly. They remind the reader they are in a flashback of sorts. Since your readers just came out of a Prologue, try to remove “had beens” all together. Readers might be anxious to read what’s happening in the present day.

Sometimes less is more in a tense situation. Thus my removing of, “…to come out of hiding.”

“The suspect’s intent had been clear about what he’d intended to do to the children once he’d found them.” This is a little repetitive and confusing. Also mucho “had beens!” I’m just offering you the same information in a more direct sentence. You don’t have to use this one. This is one of many.

Julieanne:
Good choice, and something I’m totally okay with. I may be able to write the story, but I have to depend on an editor to help make it look good.

Kristin:
(Good thing ‘cause we depend on you authors to write them. J)


           
Nick and fellow officers had tried to talk the asshole down, but he'd been too high on adrenaline and drugs to cooperate.  In the end, he'd charged another officer with that bloody his hammer raised to strike, and had been was shot. Oh, the guy would live, which was more than Nick could say about the victim. He'd received word about an hour ago that she'd died en route via helicopter to a trauma center in Phoenix.  He'd The suspect/bastard had taken that hammer to her skull. And the two little kids? They'd been were unharmed. Physically. Emotionally? He Nick wasn't sure they'd ever be okay. Not after witnessing violence like that. Nick knew it was something they'd never forget. 

Kristin:
“…that bloody” makes me think Nick is British. I know he means a literal bloody hammer, but my first thought was—BBC?

Julieanne:
Ha! No, Nick is not British. He’s originally from Texas, so he has a bit of an accent.

Kristin:
When using pronouns (he, she) be sure readers know who the he and she are. Here, Nick was referring to himself as “he,” then to the suspect. It takes a second to understand the switch and that’s a second readers are out of your story.


            God, his heart ached for them. They had no idea the grim road that lay ahead in store for them. When Child Protective Services arrived—and where the hell were they anyway? He'd called them three hours ago. —they'd The children would be taken to an emergency placement until either a family member or an adoptive family could be located. Either way, they'd have to go on without their mother. Judging by the conditions of the house, and the drug paraphernalia that had been scattered about, Nick wasn't sure it wasn't for the best,. but But how did do you tell that to a child who only knew that the mother they loved was gone.? Forever.  

Kristin:
Does “…no idea the grim road that lay in store for them” give an odd visual to you? Roads usually lay ahead of a person (for them to travel). Bad tidings, results of actions, and consequences are in store for people.

Julieanne:
Good point. Reads much better that way.

Kristin:
“and” is removed after your 2-em dash because Nick’s changing thoughts. The em dash shows one thought is being interrupted by a new thought—“and” makes it read like the thoughts are more related than they actually are.

Julieanne:
That makes sense.

Kristin:
The yellow highlighted section—is Nick thinking it is for the best that the children are going on without their mother? That’s how I read this and, though it might be in the children’s best interest, this could make him very unlikeable. Especially the way he delivers this thought.

Consider, “Judging by the conditions of the house and the drug paraphernalia that had been scattered about, Nick wasn’t sure a new home was a bad thing” or something similar.
(You also don’t want to put “wasn’t” twice in a sentence if you can help it.)

Julieanne:
That’s the general thought I was going for, but I see your point on rewording it.


            By the time Nick had his report finished his report, and the booking paperwork ready, CPS had arrived. The frazzled worker confirmed what Nick had feared. They'd be headed The children were heading to the crisis shelter, where they'd be separated until they could be placed in a home. It left Nick seethed seething in anger at the fuck-head that who had taken the children's mother away from them, and at a system that would separate siblings at a time when they needed each other the most.

Kristin:
Direct sentences are easier for the reader to digest. 
You don’t always want them, but you sometimes do.

“It” is the news that the children were being separated. “It” should be defined, but “The news left Nick seething…” is passive. Thus—Nick seethed.

Julieanne:
I have complete respect for editors. You can take a story and with your  magic-wand skills make it shine.



            Nick had just crawled into his patrol car and advised dispatch that he was clear of the E.R. when his cell phone rang. Dispatch.


Julieanne:
Kristin, thanks for taking the time to do this. I love writing a story and then watching an editor do their voodoo and make it shine.  Can’t wait to see who’s next.

Kristin:
Aha! But we’re not done yet!


“Whatever the question is, the answer is no.” He'd already put in a sixteen-hour day. And after this last case he was done.
            “Now is that any way to greet the person who has an important message for you?” Hayden. She was one of his favorite dispatchers to work with.
            Nick sighed. “Can you just throw them in my box and I'll get them tomorrow?”
            “Nope, this one is personal. She sounded rather upset.”
            Nick ran a weary hand down his face. “Who did?”
            “Sarah.
            “Sarah? My Sarah?” No, not your Sarah, Seth's Sarah. But no matter how many times he told himself that his heart refused to listen.
            “The one and only. She said it's important.”
            Nick pulled into his driveway and killed the engine. “It must be if she's calling dispatch. I'm home, mark me 10-7”.
            “Night.” She said and disconnected to answer another officer's radio call.
            Nick pulled out his cell phone and dialed the number from memory. By the third ring Nick was ready to hang up afraid he'd wake Sarah and the kids.
            “Hello?” Sarah said, breathlessly. Nick's gut clinched. Or worse interrupt something.
            He had to clear his throat before he could speak. “Sarah, it's me. Nick.”
            “Oh, thank God,” she whispered, her voice trembling.
            Nick sat up straight, his senses on high alert. “What's wrong?”
            “Seth. He's...he's...dead.”

Kristin:
Jules! This is the most relevant part! This is the content your readers are going to read about for the next 300-400 pages. Move this up.

Unless the children are relevant to the rest of your story, you could reasonably cut about two paragraphs of Nick’s what-happened-earlier pondering. If it’s something you’re willing to do I highlighted (in gray) the beginning of the paragraphs I think could go.

The first highlighted paragraph doesn’t have to be completely cut, but it could be combined with the following paragraph. That way you get to keep the “eww! Gross!” factor, but lose the things that don’t push the story or give any knowledge to the reader.



Thank you for letting me use Nick of Time and for suggesting the idea, Julieanne!
It’s already a huge hit.


To learn about Julieanne Reeves and her upcoming titles please visit her website, Facebook page, and Goodreads

You can also buy her first book, Razing Kayneon Amazon, B&N, and Smashwords.




Viewers, tell me and Jules what you think! Do you agree with the suggestions? Are you wanting to read Nick of Time when it comes out?

Thursday, April 4, 2013

Romance Writing Contests

Several times a year, romance publishers and Romance Writers of America chapters host romance writing contests. For a small entry fee, authors can submit their novellas, short stories, full-length novels, pitches, and synopses for potential book deals and Judges' feedback.

Here are some contests going on right now.


Music City Romance Writers' Pitch Contest
Deadline: April 15, 2013
Read for complete rules and details.
Entry Fee: $15
Open to all authors, all genres. Pitches for unpublished manuscripts only.

Final Round Judges:
Kristin Daly Rens, Senior Editor, Balzer + Bray
Pam van Hylckama Vlieg, Agent and Partner, Foreward Literary
Abby Zidle, Senior Editor, Gallery & Pocket Books
Jill Marsal, Agent and founding partner, Marsal Lyon Literary Agency
Jennifer Enderlin, Vice President and Associate Publisher, St. Martin's Press
Lauren Macleod, Agent, The Strothman Agency

  1. Max 200 words.
  2. Can revise after round one.
  3. Entry cannot be published, but author can. 

First Place Prize: e-Copy of “QUERY: Everything You Need to Get Started, Get Noticed, and Get Signed”, choice between a PR campaign or cover by Vania Stoyanova, Premium membership to Amy Atwell’s Author EMS, Announcement in RWR

Second Place Prize: e-Copy of “QUERY: Everything You Need to Get Started, Get Noticed, and Get Signed”, Announcement in RWR

Third Place Prize: e-Copy of “QUERY: Everything You Need to Get Started, Get Noticed, and Get Signed”, Announcement in RWR


TARA Contest
Deadline: May 1, 2013
Read for complete rules and details.
Entry Fee: $25
Open to published and unpublished authors in novel-length fiction. Manuscript must be unpublished.
  1. First 4,5000 words of manuscript. 
  2. 1,500 word synopsis due when revised entry for final judging is submitted. 
  3. No short stories.
  4. Manuscript must center around female protagonist. 

First Place Prize: Sterling silver TARA pendant.

All finalists receive certificates.
Winners are announced in the Romance Writers Report.


Alaska Break-Up Contest
Deadline: May 1, 2013
Read for complete rules and details.
Entry Fee: $30
Open to published and unpublished authors. Unpublished manuscripts only.
  1. Enter your best, most tension filled break-up or darkest moment scene.
  2. Must not exceed 10 pages.
  3. Include a set-up scene (1-3 pages) to assist judges in understanding
    entry selection. (Not synopsis.)
Winning Entry:
Will be submitted for a personal critique by New York Times Best Selling author Cherry Adair.


2013 Maggie Awards
Deadline: May 8, 2013 (published manuscripts)
                    June 10, 2013 (unpublished manuscripts)
Read for complete rules and details.
Entry Fee: $20 (published)
                       $30 (unpublished, non GRW members), $25 (unpublished, GRW members)
Open to published RWA authors only. (Prestigious award, authors. Try to win this.)

Winners announced at GRW's Moonlight & Magnolias banquet on October 5, 2013.


Harlequin Blaze Writing Contest
Deadline: June 1, 2013
Read for complete rules and details.
Entry Fee: None
Open to all legal U.S. and Canada residents (excluding Quebec).
  1. Send your synopsis (max 10 pages) and first chapter (max 25 pages) of a Harlequin Blaze targeted manuscript to blazewritingchallenge@harlequin.ca. Include author name, phone number, address, and name of manuscript.
First place prize: Winner will have a Blaze editor as a mentor for a
month for advice and guidance with respect to the submission.

Second place prize: Winner will get a one-time editorial consultation
regarding the submission, conducted via telephone, with a Blaze editor.

Third place prize: Winner will receive a six months' subscription to the
Harlequin Blaze series. 


Want more romance writing contests? 
Check out these:

Orange Rose Contest; and
Passionate Plume Contest (erotic romance);



Thursday, March 28, 2013

HarperCollins Accepts Unsolicited Romance Submissions


The Romantic Editor 
posts research on publishers and submissions.
This week is about HarperCollins.


Big Six publisher HarperCollins has over 30 imprints within the U.S.

Avon Romance and Avon Impulse are HarperCollins's romance imprints.

Avon Impulse is digital original, meaning if your digital book sells well Avon may distribute it in print.

Avon Romance is mass market original. This is the original Avon Romance imprint and books published with Avon Romance are released in mass market paperback and in digital format at the same time.

The call for romance submissions is on Avon's homepage. (Scroll down, glance right.)

Avon submission guidelines state all manuscripts can be submitted online. Avon Romance and Avon Impulse share the same staff. (The manuscript lengths listed in the guidelines differ from the online submission form.)

The guidelines and online submission form are plainly written and user friendly, however a summary of what's being requested is below.


Avon Romance and Avon Impulse

Agented or Unagented submissions.
Manuscript lengths accepted: 10-25k, 25-50k or 50-100k
Romance genres accepted: General, Contemporary, Fantasy, Gothic, Historical, Regional, Regency, Short Stories, Time Travel, Suspense, Paranormal
Romance subgenres accepted: Gothic, Steampunk, Shifter, Vampire, Ghost, Magical, Futuristic, Time Travel, Western, Small Town, Suspense, Fantasy, Other

Must provide best scene or first 1k words. (Less than 1k words in length.)
Must provide query letter. (Less than 750 words in length.)
No special formatting required.

What might get you noticed:
Sexy alpha heroes who give heroine everything she needs so they can be together.
Smart, brave heroines who take chances in life and love.
Great story setting.
Series potential.
Dark and dramatic.
General response time: 3 months


Avon isn't just historicals. Rachel Gibson's editor Lucia Marco talks about that and more in her October 2012 interview with RomanceUniversity.org.


Read Related Articles:
Grand Central Publishing's romance submission guidelinesand 
MacMillon's paranormal romance submission guidelines

Written by: Kristin Anders, The Romantic Editor


For related articles, search using the below label "Publisher seeking romance submissions."

Thursday, March 7, 2013

For All Your Editing Privacy Needs (by Kristin Anders)

In a law office, people are familiar with attorney-client privilege. Basically, communications between a client and his or her attorney are protected against disclosure. There are several loop holes and what-ifs to that, but the gist is--attorneys are not supposed to blab. But their clients can.

Having worked in law firms for six years, it makes sense that this practice rolls over to my editing business. It's not intentional, it just does. And I'm not sure it's a bad thing.

Here's what's confidential. Who has hired me, when they hired me, what they're working on, and what they're paying me (though, really, the fees are on the site). Until their book is published most of these things cannot be pried from my lips. Yes, I check up on clients just as I hope they check up on me. But in general? No. There are no Facebook posts, no tweets, no Google Circles are alerted. It's between the author and me unless they give me permission to do otherwise.

Also, like with attorney-client privilege, the privilege can be broken when the client breaks it. To me, that's when the book is published with my name in front as editor. This is a great thing. Authors get to release their babies into the world and I get to point at their novels and shout, "See?? TOLD you I had a job!"

But more than that I want to help sell the novel. Why wouldn't I? I'm proud of it, too. By now the author and I are buds. Again, why wouldn't we be? We have one of the strongest common interests in the world: shared love for the writing process. I do not underestimate that.

Promoting the novels and authors that have become (and are becoming) dear to me is something that is going to happen. I have no idea how I'm going to fit it in the day, but I will. It's that important.

An editor's relationship with an author is private. Hell, it's sacred. That relationship should be solid. Don't listen to any bafoon who tells you to nix a character, delete an entire point of view or change your hero without trusting them completely. And what happens in the editing process stays in the editing process unless the editor has permission to bring it out.

But claiming an author as a client? Claiming a book as your adoptive child? Yes, that happens the very moment the book becomes live (hopefully sooner). Because that baby is beautiful and I love it too.

Do you have any editing experiences--good or bad? Do you think editors should be on the hush-hush or wear their authors and their work loud and proud?


For related articles, search using the below label "personal."

Tuesday, March 5, 2013

Macmillon US Accepts Unagented Paranormal Romance Submissions

Every Tuesday The Romantic Editor 
posts research on publishers and submissions.
This week is about Macmillon US.


Without getting too technical... 

Macmillan US belongs to a worldwide publisher that is part of publishing's Big Six. Macmillan US has five book publishers under its umbrella.

Of those five publishers, four publish (or published) romance. Of those four, two actively publish romance and only one accepts unagented submissions.


St. Martin's Press 
Publishes romance.
Agented submissions only. Guidelines are not online. 
St. Martin's Press recommends authors find an agent at Literary Market Place Online.


TOR/FORGE
Also known as Tom Doherty Associates, LLC
Publishes romance.
Agented and Unagented submissions.
Read complete TOR/FORGE's submission guidelines for unagented submissions.

Unagented submission (summarized) guidelines:
First three chapters, standard manuscript form on white paper (under 10k words);
Synopsis;
Dated cover letter with all contact information; and
Self-addressed, stamped, business-size envelope for reply letter.
Do not send query letter.
Do not send submissions via fax or email.
Do not send disks or only copies or cover art or author photo or promo or food or bribes.
General response time: 4-6 months.

Send submissions to:
Tom Doherty Associates, LLC
175 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10010

Address paranormal romance submissions to:
Paranormal Romance: Acquisitions Editor, Paranormal Romance


Read last week's post about Grand Central Publishing's submission guidelines.

Written by: Kristin Anders, The Romantic Editor


For similar articles, search using the tag "Publisher seeking romance submissions."

Thursday, February 28, 2013

Exclamation Points: The Excited Killers (by Kristin Anders)


Every time an exclamation point is used 
an editor dies.


Exclamation points should be rare.

All punctuation is not created equal. Periods stop the thought. Question marks end dialogue (try not to use outside of dialogue, they can throw readers out of the story). Commas pause. Exclamation points... well, in fiction exclamation points kill things. Like your work in progress.


No Need for Narration Emphasis
Exclamation points make this dark moment read like a comic book.
Next year she'd have to make friends with someone on the decorations committee so she wouldn't end up looking like part of the furnishings! Good thing she'd picked up a bit of color at the beach last weekend so at least she was visible above the strapless bodice. Still, she felt indistinguishable from her snow-white surroundings, blending in where others shined.
And wasn't that just a metaphor for her life! 
 - Seducing Cinderella by Gina L. Maxwell (punctuation modified)

How she really wrote it:
Next year she'd have to make friends with someone on the decorations committee so she wouldn't end up looking like part of the furnishings. Good thing she'd picked up a bit of color at the beach last weekend so at least she was visible above the strapless bodice. Still, she felt indistinguishable from her snow-white surroundings, blending in where others shined.
And wasn't that just a metaphor for her life. 
 - Seducing Cinderella by Gina L. Maxwell

The first excerpt loses emotional value because there's dramatic punctuation.


Little Need for Dialogue Emphasis
Exclamation points make dialogue read over-the-top. There are few exceptions.

The movie Pride & Prejudice is a great example of this. Heroine Elizabeth Bennet is a strong, confident character who speaks her mind in a respectful tone. Like when she refused her cousin's offer of marriage:
"I am not the sort of female to torment a respectable man. Please understand I cannot accept you." 
- Elizabeth Bennet, movie Pride & Prejudice

Now imagine if the script was written with exclamation points:

"I am not the sort of female to torment a respectable man! Please understand I cannot accept you!" 
- The Elizabeth Bennet we wouldn't have liked, thankfully not in the movie Pride & Prejudice

The second Elizabeth Bennet sounds an awful lot like her mother, who is written over-the-top and ridiculous  on purpose. In her novel Jane Austen describes Mrs. Bennet as, "...a woman of mean understanding, little information, and uncertain temper."

Be prepared for a manuscript full of Mrs. Bennets if you use exclamation points. Some readers will never forgive you.

What are the few exceptions to exclamation points in dialogue?
"The baby's coming!"
"Look out!" 

And other urgent, urgent matters. Exclamation points can also be used when a character is yelling across a far distance, like from rooftops or across a stadium. Same if the character is yelling over a loud noise.

But still use sparingly.


Can Ruin Novels
Exclamation points are often crutches, being used for the same characters or to show the same emotion.

Redundant exclamation points really kill a manuscript. If every time we see Mr. X he's storming into the room and screaming! ...the reader may become bored with him because all his appearances read the same.

If surprise is always emphasized with "!!" the manuscript lacks description (in verbs; try not to fix this with several adjectives). Exclamation points do not exist to show emotion; they exist to heighten it on occasion. If readers can't tell a scene is charged with [insert emotion here] the issue is with the writing, not the punctuation.


That said, continue to write in the wake of punctuation mistakes. Every manuscript I edit will have them. I am far from perfect and there are no perfect books. Just remember if exclamation points are needed, the writing may be wrong.

Thanks for reading!


Have an opinion on exclamation points? Let's hear it!

Written by: Kristin Anders, The Romantic Editor

For similar articles, search using the below label "copyedit."


Monday, February 25, 2013

Grand Central Publishing Accepts Unagented Submissions


“Grand Central Publishing will nearly double the releases from its romance imprint Forever 
and its eBook-only counterpart Forever Yours this year.”
Excerpt from Forever and Forever Yours acquiring article 
written by GalleyCat’s editor, Jason Boog, on February 21, 2013


Grand Central Publishing is the only publishing group owned by Hachette—one of the publishing Big Six—to have romance imprints. In fact, it has two: Forever and Forever Yours. 

Forever and Forever Yours will publish more than 120 titles in 2013 and 190 titles in 2014. What does this mean for authors? It means Grand Central’s imprints are likely looking for submissions.


Agented authors can submit to both imprints.

Unagented authors can submit to the Forever Yours digital only imprint.


Forever
Forever was launched in 2003 and has since published authors such as Margaret Mallory, Jessica Shalvis, and Elizabeth Hoyt. Forever publishes in print and digital.

Submissions Guidelines:

Agented only.
First-time authors must submit a completed manuscript.
Published authors may submit a proposal and three sample chapters.
85-95k word manuscripts.
All subgenres of romance welcome: paranormal, sensual historical, contemporaries, romantic suspense, westerns, erotic romance.


Forever Yours
Forever yours was launched in 2012 and publishes almost any length romance. 
Forever Yours publishes digital only.

Submission Guidelines: 

Agented and Unagented.
Query letter introducing yourself, your genre, and work word count.
A detailed 3-5 page synopsis.
Completed manuscript saved as an RTF file.
8-100k word manuscripts.

Formatting. Do not include headers, footers, page numbers, or graphics. All MS must be in Times New Roman font.

Please include the following information on the first page of all submission package files: title of the MS, author name, email address, phone number, and word count of completed MS.

Send submissions to: ForeverYours at hbgusa dot com
Will receive auto-response, then allow 6-8 weeks for response.

All subgenres of romance welcome. Including, but not limited to: contemporary, romantic comedy, romantic suspense, western, historical, inspiration, paranormal, sci-fi/fantasy, futuristic, urban fantasy, steampunk, time-travel, and erotica.
Not accepting: YA, mystery, general fiction, non-fiction, or poetry.


Written by: Kristin Anders, The Romantic Editor


For related articles, search using the below label "Publisher seeking romance submissions."

Thursday, February 21, 2013

Must Love Romance

In case it hasn't become apparent to my four readers out there...

I have no idea what I'm doing with this blog.

Blogging is an art. Stop laughing. No wait. Keep laughing. Funny blogs keep readers coming back. And my funny bone doesn't convey well through the Internet. But it has a killer sense of humor. Maybe talented guest bloggers could bring all the people. Funny guest bloggers.

Can there be a blog where guest bloggers only post and never the owner? There can. It's called Ravishing Romances and that's already run by Enchanting Ella and Musing Maddie. Maybe that could work here, too.

Funny bloggers please apply. Must Love Romance.

In the meantime I apologize, but you have me. With nothing of interest to say. But I could use some advice.

Creative marketing (I think) is essential to any successful business and I'm not sure how to approach the marketing for The Romantic Editor.

I did take out a Facebook Ad for one week and that worked out really well. Since The Romantic Editor sells something more expensive than a book, the ad directed users toward The Romantic Editor's FB page for Likes. It received several and I received several emails for work. No bites, but nibbles are great.

There's this website, of course, and the lovely and talented Carrie of Seductive Designs created the banner, the button, and the favicon.

Social media is active for Goodreads, Twitter, and Facebook.

There's no newsletter. One might start once clients release novels edited by me. That's my news and hopefully it helps authors generate more sales.

I contacted Kristen Lamb (Ingrid, actually) about blogging techniques. No response. Guess some bloggers have no hope.

Just ordered an ink stamp that reads, "Courtesy of: The Romantic Editor" with the website. Now when books are donated to bookstores, conferences, and book groups the name is at least inside.

...but what else? Is there anything else? Should there be anything else? There are grander ideas for marketing, but they require a larger, more profitable business. At the end of the day I am one editor charging a low fee. Expensive advertising might make people aware, but the money generated should cover the cost of advertising.

Which means that sponsoring romance conferences might help to only break the bank.

Anyone have any creative ideas? Please share them if you do.


And seriously, funny people of the World Wide Web. Please apply inside. Must Love Romance.


To read similar articles, search using the below label "personal."

Saturday, February 2, 2013

When to Hire an Editor...or not (by Kristin Anders)

Since The Romantic Editor's January 14th launch date I've received a lot of questions with the same meaning:

Is my manuscript ready for an editor?

Today, while reading author Jeaniene Frost's blog post titled Q&A for Writers about when to get an agent, I was inspired.


When to Hire an Editor...or not


Let's just all agree that no manuscript needs an editor until the manuscript is finished. 

I have worked on barely unfinished manuscripts, but I will not--will not--line edit or copyedit them. I'll help fill in plot holes, give pointers for characters or general feedback. (Basically, writing advice with a bunch of expert blog posts and writing websites to back me up.) 

But never pay for your words to be line edited, copyedited or proofread until your manuscript is finished, critiqued, critiqued again, and solid. If you get line edits today, then receive a critique from your CP (critique partner) tomorrow about how Heroine's sister should replace the character of Heroine's best friend...you've just wasted your money. You're going to need the manuscript line edited post substantial plot/character changes to check for consistency. 


You can get plot advice when your manuscript is in the last 5,000 words.

Sometimes you just don't know about a plot or character. An editor who offers content and substantial edits or editorial letters can help.  Spoiler Alert: So can a critique partner, a really good beta reader or both. If you don't have access to skilled friends whom you brainstorm with or if you just want an unbiased third party--you can use an editor. But only use them for plot and character analysis until you're finished and have self-edited.

Self-edited??


Self-edit first, then hire an editor.

Only you know how you intend for your novel to flow. Your first draft will not flow that way. You can leave it to the editor to determine what you meant or you can do another read through (or two) and make your characters come across exactly how you want. Don't worry; the editor has lots more to do and the better the self-edit, the better the editor's edit.


Determine whether you are looking for an agent, submitting to a publisher or self-publishing.

I hit a lot of walls when I ask this question. Be forewarned: if you email me about a manuscript I'm asking you what you intend to do with it.

If you have a 110,000 word paranormal manuscript and want to sell it to Harlequin HQN, my suggestion will be to cut about 10,000 words through edits, then I'll ask who your agent is and what your query letter looks like. Because as of today, HQN is 90,000 words and only accepts agented submissions.

If you want to submit to a romance category line there are general tropes I will look for. Category is also shorter than single title.


If you're self publishing your word count is your own and tropes aren't required. You can write about taboo topics and you have more plot leeway. The rules are different. What editors edit is different.

So determine where you want your manuscript to land and tell your editor.


Do NOT hire an editor you've never heard of, who has no references, no contact information, and for all intensive purposes is anonymous. 

This goes without much explanation. Even a brand spanking new editor should have a few people you can contact to confirm they are legitimate.


Do NOT hire an editor you can't afford.

You love your book; so do editors. But don't break the bank paying for the editor of your dreams. Freelance editors can't guarantee you a book deal, an agent contract or book sales. Be cost efficient and smart in your choice. If you can't afford one editor you love, ask them for a reference to one who costs less.


Do NOT hire an editor to do something they aren't qualified to do.

Editors edit and not all editors offer the same edits. Websites and fee agreements should plainly state what you're paying for and a deadline in which you'll receive it.


Your editor should act legitimate.

Not every editor has three social media accounts, a home address listed, and a phone number for you to call, but there are certain things that should make you feel more at ease. 

Editors who accept payment through Paypal or Google can probably be traced if necessary. (Check Paypal and Google's website to find out.) Look for editors with well-known references. Editors who send detailed invoices and emails are good indicators as well. 

Editors should give you a paper trail and your editor should allow their edits to be your own once you pay for them. Meaning: if your publishing house editor wants to see what your freelance (pre-contract) editor did--you should be able to turn over their notes and emails guilt free.


Lastly, editors should remind authors of one thing:

Publishing houses will edit your manuscripts again even if you pay for it to be edited for submission. It's going to happen. You probably should have your manuscript edited for submission anyway, but keep in mind that your publisher will edit it too.


Any other advice for authors searching for editors? 
Let's hear it!



Written by: Kristin Anders, The Romantic Editor


To read similar articles, search using the below label "How To Articles."


Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Finishing the First Draft (by Kristin Anders)

As I write this, I am actively working with three authors. Two of which have not finished their first draft. One is working on her rewrite.

So how many authors am I working with? One, really. And only when she has a specific question for me.

Writers, hear this. The most important thing you can do for your career, your stories, and your characters is finish your first draft.

Without it you are not even started. Write every day. Every day. You're on Facebook. You probably email and tweet. Set aside some time to work on your novel. It deserves it.

First drafts are not meant to be polished. They are meant to be finished. How can you polish the story when you're not 100% sure where it's going? This is especially true if you are a panster. This is still true if you are a plotter.

The first draft will likely not be consistent. Your hero may change his traits or even his personality. Your heroine may have more of a backbone than you planned. Your secondary character may turn your couple into a love triangle. But you will never know what your characters are capable of if you don't finish their story.

Finish their story. Finish your story.

I have never heard of more writer's block than on the first draft. I'm not sure why. Every time an author talks about The Block I think of Stephen King's book On Writing. In it he talks about the muse.

"There is a muse, but he's not going to come fluttering down into your writing room and scatter creative fairy-dust all over your typewriter or computer station. He lives in the ground. He's a basement guy. You have to descend to his level, and once you get down there you have to furnish an apartment for him to live in. You have to do all the grunt labor, in other words, while the muse sits and smokes his cigars and admires his bowling trophies and pretends to ignore you. Do you think it's fair? I think it's fair. He may not be much to look at, that muse-guy, and he may not be much of a conversationalist (what I get out of mine is mostly surly grunts, unless he's on duty), but he's got the inspiration. It's right that you should do all the work and burn all the midnight oil, because the guy with the cigar and the little wings has got a bag of magic. There's stuff in there that can change your life. Believe me, I know."

These words give me chill bumps every time.

Write through your blocks. Write when you have no plot. Write through the silence. Because in the end you will have a story. An unvarnished, incomplete, raw, and gorgeous story. That is the goal of your first draft.

Now go write it.

Wishing You a Muse to Change Your Life,

Kristin Anders


For similar articles, search using the below label "Writing Inspiration."